TY - JOUR
T1 - A Habermasian response to the legitimacy crisis of investment arbitration
AU - Quintero, Rafael
PY - 2023/3/23
Y1 - 2023/3/23
N2 - This article presents the Habermasian theory of adjudication’s role in and legitimacy to achieve three major objectives, first, to develop a diagnosis of the legitimacy crisis of investment arbitration; second, to understand why dominant positivistic approaches cannot solve it; and third, to propose argumentative strategies so that investment arbitrators can address this crisis.
AB - This article presents the Habermasian theory of adjudication’s role in and legitimacy to achieve three major objectives, first, to develop a diagnosis of the legitimacy crisis of investment arbitration; second, to understand why dominant positivistic approaches cannot solve it; and third, to propose argumentative strategies so that investment arbitrators can address this crisis.
UR - https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/14584/
U2 - https://doi.org/10.54148/ELTELJ.2022.1.49
DO - https://doi.org/10.54148/ELTELJ.2022.1.49
M3 - Article
SN - 2064-4965
VL - 1
SP - 49
JO - ELTE LAW JOURNAL
JF - ELTE LAW JOURNAL
ER -