A patient-preference cohort study of office versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding

on behalf of the OPT trial collaborative group

doi:10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4

A patient-preference cohort study of office versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding

on behalf of the OPT trial collaborative group

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Citations (SciVal)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	313-322
Number of pages	10
Journal	Gynecological Surgery
Volume	13
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4
Publication status	Published (VoR) - 1 Nov 2016

Funding

The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health. The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health.

Keywords

Abnormal uterine bleeding
Ambulatory gynaecology
Office polypectomy
Patient preference
Uterine polyp

Access to Document

10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4

Cite this

@article{c6ed91e2ff394a589b172a6130501650,

title = "A patient-preference cohort study of office versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding",

keywords = "Abnormal uterine bleeding, Ambulatory gynaecology, Office polypectomy, Patient preference, Uterine polyp",

author = "\{on behalf of the OPT trial collaborative group\} and Cooper, \{Natalie A.M.\} and Lee Middleton and Paul Smith and Elaine Denny and Lynda Stobert and Jane Daniels and Clark, \{T. Justin\} and K. Cannon and Farag, \{K. A.\} and K. Raychaudhuri and M. Reid and A. Zahid and J. Blunn and S. Guruswami and S. Irani and D. Robinson and T. Bingham and J. Gupta and S. Madari and D. Mellers and S. O'Connor and C. O'Hara and M. Pathak and V. Preece and E. Sangha and M. Shehmar and P. Trinham and A. Wilson and J. Dent and J. Macdonald and P. Sengupta and C. Brookes and J. Davies and M. Jackson and S. Jones and H. Ludkin and S. Riddiough and J. Allen and T. Cathcart and D. Cox and S. Ford and L. Kenny and K. Phillips and N. Rawal and A. Rodgers and J. Siddiqui and A. Dine-Atkinson and S. Kalkur and G. Merriner and J. Ben-Nagi",

note = "Funding Information: The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women{\textquoteright}s NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health. Funding Information: The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, The Author(s).",

year = "2016",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "313--322",

journal = "Gynecological Surgery",

issn = "1613-2076",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A patient-preference cohort study of office versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding

AU - on behalf of the OPT trial collaborative group

AU - Cooper, Natalie A.M.

AU - Middleton, Lee

AU - Smith, Paul

AU - Denny, Elaine

AU - Stobert, Lynda

AU - Daniels, Jane

AU - Clark, T. Justin

AU - Cannon, K.

AU - Farag, K. A.

AU - Raychaudhuri, K.

AU - Reid, M.

AU - Zahid, A.

AU - Blunn, J.

AU - Guruswami, S.

AU - Irani, S.

AU - Robinson, D.

AU - Bingham, T.

AU - Gupta, J.

AU - Madari, S.

AU - Mellers, D.

AU - O'Connor, S.

AU - O'Hara, C.

AU - Pathak, M.

AU - Preece, V.

AU - Sangha, E.

AU - Shehmar, M.

AU - Trinham, P.

AU - Wilson, A.

AU - Dent, J.

AU - Macdonald, J.

AU - Sengupta, P.

AU - Brookes, C.

AU - Davies, J.

AU - Jackson, M.

AU - Jones, S.

AU - Ludkin, H.

AU - Riddiough, S.

AU - Allen, J.

AU - Cathcart, T.

AU - Cox, D.

AU - Ford, S.

AU - Kenny, L.

AU - Phillips, K.

AU - Rawal, N.

AU - Rodgers, A.

AU - Siddiqui, J.

AU - Dine-Atkinson, A.

AU - Kalkur, S.

AU - Merriner, G.

AU - Ben-Nagi, J.

N1 - Funding Information: The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health. Funding Information: The study sponsors were the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, and the study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/404/84). The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service or the English Department of Health. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, The Author(s).

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

KW - Abnormal uterine bleeding

KW - Ambulatory gynaecology

KW - Office polypectomy

KW - Patient preference

KW - Uterine polyp

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84968547868

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968547868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4

DO - 10.1007/s10397-016-0946-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84968547868

SN - 1613-2076

VL - 13

SP - 313

EP - 322

JO - Gynecological Surgery

JF - Gynecological Surgery

IS - 4

ER -

A patient-preference cohort study of office versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this