A Positive Right to Rehabilitation? An Examination of the ‘Principle of Rehabilitation’ in the Caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights

Rebecca Lawrence (Corresponding / Lead Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article analyses the development and the role of the 'principle of rehabilitation' in the European Court of Human Rights' caselaw on prisoner rights. It will be demonstrated that, outside of the context of whole-life sentences, the impact of the principle on the Court's reasoning process has been relatively limited, despite increasing reference by the Court to the growing importance of the principle. Further, that the Court allowing the pursuit of rehabilitation to be used as justification for interferences with other Convention rights within its caselaw undermines the link made by the Court between rehabilitation and human dignity. Finally, it is argued that a conception of rehabilitation that is underpinned by human dignity requires recognition of a positive duty on states to provide access to appropriate rehabilitative treatment for all prisoners.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalHuman Rights Law Review
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 17 Mar 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Positive Right to Rehabilitation? An Examination of the ‘Principle of Rehabilitation’ in the Caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this