A Refreshing Perspective on the Means of Proof of Contents of Public Documents under the Nigerian Law

A.A. Tijani, Philip E. Oamen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The use of credible and admissible evidence, oral or documentary, in proof of a fact in question in any judicial proceeding, is a sine quo non to the success of a case. In the case of documentary evidence, whether private or public, the law requires that same is preferably proved by producing the primary evidence and, in its absence, secondary evidence of varying kinds. With respect to a public document, the means of proving same is, nonetheless, un changed save however, that its exclusive secondary means of proof is by producing a certified true copy thereof. This paper attempts to examine the concept of public documents as a means of proving facts in evidence, its underlining principles and other prevailing trends, including misconceptions, amidst legal authors, practitioners and judicial officers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-253
    Number of pages26
    JournalThe Journal of Commercial, Private and Industrial Law
    Volume1
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 1 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Refreshing Perspective on the Means of Proof of Contents of Public Documents under the Nigerian Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this