Cross-border insolvency and rescue law theory: Moving away from the traditional debate on universalism and territorialism.

Emilie Ghio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The framework in which cross-border insolvency and rescue law is construed focuses on the universalism and territorialism divide, which originated in academic scholarship in the United States. This paper argues that this framework is not the most appropriate for the European Union at present and should be replaced by a theoretical framework tackling the sui generis nature of the EU.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)713-728
    Number of pages16
    JournalInternational Company and Commercial Law Review
    Volume12
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 1 Dec 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-border insolvency and rescue law theory: Moving away from the traditional debate on universalism and territorialism.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this