Do co-opted boards protect CEOs from ESG controversies?

Abdul Ghafoor, Ammar Ali Gull*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    We explore the relationship between board co-option and ESG controversies using an extensive sample of U.S. firms from 2002 to 2018. Contrary to previous studies highlighting the potential negative impacts of co-opted boards on organizational outcomes, our research reveals the beneficial role of co-opted directors. In particular, firms with a higher proportion of co-opted directors have CEOs who experience fewer ESG controversies. These findings offer important implications for stakeholders, shifting the narrative on board co-option.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number105263
    JournalFinance Research Letters
    Volume63
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 4 Apr 2024

    Keywords

    • Board co-option
    • Esg (environmental, social and governance) controversies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do co-opted boards protect CEOs from ESG controversies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this