TY - JOUR
T1 - Haptic Feedback to Overcome Barriers for Visually Impaired Users in Digital Audio Workstations
AU - Michailidis, Tychonas
AU - Karpodini, Christina
AU - Creed, Chris
AU - Williams, Ian
PY - 2025/3/3
Y1 - 2025/3/3
N2 - Challenges and accessibility barriers associated with Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs) for users who are Blind and Visually Impaired (BVI) are well established. However, there has been a lack of research that examines how musical hardware devices are used as assistive tools and their role in improving DAW workflows. Nineteen participants from the BVI community were interviewed to detail their workflows, highlighting methods, benefits, and challenges of integrating musical hardware devices within their DAW. Results found that sixteen participants are using at least one hardware device (e.g., Komplete Kontrol, and Softube Console 1) in their workflows as an accessibility tool for DAW features (e.g., FX parameters, automation, volume and pan). Such tools lead to improvements in efficiency and enhanced creativity. Participants’ choice of hardware devices was influenced by multiple factors, such as technical specification, accessibility features, usability, and cost. Finally, we highlight suggestions for future research and development areas with a particular emphasis on proposing ways of implementing vibrotactile feedback that will enhance DAWs’ accessibility.
AB - Challenges and accessibility barriers associated with Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs) for users who are Blind and Visually Impaired (BVI) are well established. However, there has been a lack of research that examines how musical hardware devices are used as assistive tools and their role in improving DAW workflows. Nineteen participants from the BVI community were interviewed to detail their workflows, highlighting methods, benefits, and challenges of integrating musical hardware devices within their DAW. Results found that sixteen participants are using at least one hardware device (e.g., Komplete Kontrol, and Softube Console 1) in their workflows as an accessibility tool for DAW features (e.g., FX parameters, automation, volume and pan). Such tools lead to improvements in efficiency and enhanced creativity. Participants’ choice of hardware devices was influenced by multiple factors, such as technical specification, accessibility features, usability, and cost. Finally, we highlight suggestions for future research and development areas with a particular emphasis on proposing ways of implementing vibrotactile feedback that will enhance DAWs’ accessibility.
UR - https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/16223/
U2 - 10.1080/10447318.2025.2464899
DO - 10.1080/10447318.2025.2464899
M3 - Article
SN - 1044-7318
JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
ER -