Is Bowman's paradox an empirical artifact? Evidence from Asian emerging countries

Asad Khan* (Corresponding / Lead Author), Zia ur Rehman, Imtiaz Badshah, Muhammad Ibrahim Khan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose
This study aims to reconcile and address Bowman’s paradox empirical criticism from the lens of financial theory, corporate strategy and their econometric adversaries based on three issues, i.e. risk conceptualization, measurement and econometric modelling in Asian emerging countries (AEC).

Design/methodology/approach
The study is conducted on panel data sampling from 2,872 firms across four Asian Emerging Countries (AEC) and employs a two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimation technique. We proposed a theoretical framework based on triangulation that outlines four risk-return relationships based on proxies derived from capital market and firm-level data and used different econometric models to answer Bowman’s paradox ongoing criticism.

Findings
The empirical results negate the empirical artifact viewpoint in AEC. The risk-return relationship estimated on firm accounting-based ratios or its combination with market-based measures supports Bowman’s paradox and thus upholds the corporate strategy point o
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2071
Number of pages2090
JournalManagerial Finance
Volume50
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 18 Oct 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Bowman's paradox an empirical artifact? Evidence from Asian emerging countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this