Is Bowman's paradox an empirical artifact? Evidence from Asian emerging countries

Asad Khan* (Corresponding / Lead Author), Zia ur Rehman, Imtiaz Badshah, Muhammad Ibrahim Khan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose
    This study aims to reconcile and address Bowman’s paradox empirical criticism from the lens of financial theory, corporate strategy and their econometric adversaries based on three issues, i.e. risk conceptualization, measurement and econometric modelling in Asian emerging countries (AEC).

    Design/methodology/approach
    The study is conducted on panel data sampling from 2,872 firms across four Asian Emerging Countries (AEC) and employs a two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimation technique. We proposed a theoretical framework based on triangulation that outlines four risk-return relationships based on proxies derived from capital market and firm-level data and used different econometric models to answer Bowman’s paradox ongoing criticism.

    Findings
    The empirical results negate the empirical artifact viewpoint in AEC. The risk-return relationship estimated on firm accounting-based ratios or its combination with market-based measures supports Bowman’s paradox and thus upholds the corporate strategy point o
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2071
    Number of pages2090
    JournalManagerial Finance
    Volume50
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 18 Oct 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is Bowman's paradox an empirical artifact? Evidence from Asian emerging countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this