On Prospecting: Visual Culture between Extraction and Speculation

Theo Reeves Evison (Corresponding / Lead Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In its narrow sense, prospecting is defined as the search for mineral deposits with
    a view to exploit them for financial gain. In the last few decades, this definition has been expanded
    to include bioprospecting, in which genetic resources are transformed into proprietary
    knowledge, frequently at the expense of communities who have cultivated this knowledge
    over generations. Prospecting is therefore inescapably extractive, but insofar as it involves a
    gamble on the profitability of a resource in the future, it is also inherently speculative. Taking
    recent discussions of the “extractive view” as its starting point, this article focuses on the role
    of visual culture in prospecting. It investigates how the search for resources generates a visual
    culture of prospecting and a visual culture about prospecting, whether through aerial
    views of resource frontiers, spectacular images that attract venture capital, or “specimen
    views” that isolate objects of economic interest. Tracing a path from the nineteenth-century
    survey photographs of Timothy O’Sullivan to contemporary work by the likes of Edith Morales
    and the group On-Trade-Off, it demonstrates how artists repurpose and diversify the
    visual culture of prospecting, documenting the forces at play in the struggle over lithium
    extraction or investigating the methods by which genetic raw materials are turned into patentable
    commodities.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEnvironmental Humanities
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 1 Nov 2024

    Keywords

    • extraction
    • prospecting
    • speculation
    • verticality
    • contemporary art

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On Prospecting: Visual Culture between Extraction and Speculation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this