Abstract
Microphone selection plays a crucial role in shaping the timbre of recorded kick drums, yet formal subjective evaluations of common kick drum microphones remain limited. This study investigates listener preference for 11 microphones, both in their unprocessed form and after post-processing by three experienced professional audio engineers. All recordings were made under controlled conditions using consistent mic placement and performance. A subjective listening test with 25 participants evaluated each microphone across four listening tests. Results revealed significant differences between microphones in the unprocessed condition, with preferences converging after processing, indicating a reduction in perceptual variations. While processing significantly altered relative preference of nearly all microphones, ratings of two microphones remained consistent across all conditions. Findings also suggest that while processing can elevate certain microphones perceptual subjectivity, others were found to never be rated significantly different from one another regardless of the engineers processing approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Publication status | Published (VoR) - 14 Oct 2025 |
| Event | 159th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society - Long Beach, CA, USA, Long Beach, United States Duration: 23 Oct 2025 → 25 Oct 2025 Conference number: 159 |
Conference
| Conference | 159th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | AES 159th Convention |
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Long Beach |
| Period | 23/10/25 → 25/10/25 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptual Evaluation of Varied Kick Drum Microphones, With and Without Post-Processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver