Public and private discourses of lesbians: exploring the discourses surrounding lesbians in the spoken BNC2014 and the British press in 2017

Frazer Heritage

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper explores the language used to discuss lesbians in both informal spoken British English and British written news media. The research draws on two data sources: the Spoken BNC2014 and a specialised corpus of 1.2 million words from newspapers written between January 2017 and December 2017 inclusive. Discourses (re) produced in both informal conversations and the mass media are ways of sustaining and maintaining ideological stances towards groups marginalised due to their sexuality (see Baker, 2014; Gupta, 2016). In this paper, I argue that the discourses surrounding lesbians found within both corpora are problematic and archaic. I discuss two prominent discourses in spoken British English (that lesbians are typically seen as masculine, which in turn is judged negatively, and that lesbianism is a choice), two prominent discourses in written British English (that lesbians are a threat to children and that lesbianism is a marked identity which is delegitimised), and one discourse which overlaps across both corpora (that all gender, sexual, and romantic minorities are a homogenised group). The discourses in both corpora appear to be damaging to how lesbians are viewed in general society and tend to mask underlying homophobic ideologies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)61-89
    Number of pages29
    JournalJournal of Corpora and Discourse Studies
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 27 Sept 2022

    Keywords

    • Gender and Sexuality; Lesbians; Queer Linguistics; Representation; Media Discourse; British English

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Public and private discourses of lesbians: exploring the discourses surrounding lesbians in the spoken BNC2014 and the British press in 2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this