Talent inclusion: An imperfect solution to genetic testing in sport - Response to commentaries

Alexander B. T. McAuley, Joseph Baker, Kathryn Johnston, Ian Varley, Adam J. Herbert, Bruce Suraci, David C. Hughes, Loukia Tsaprouni, Adam L. Kelly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We are extremely grateful our esteemed colleagues Craig Pickering, Duarte Araújo, Keith Davids, and Kevin Till have read and offered insightful reflections on the target article ?Talent inclusion and genetic testing in sport: A practitioner?s guide?. We take the opportunity in the present article to respond to the three commentaries provided by these authors. In our target article, we highlighted at this moment in time, there is unequivocal disapproval in the scientific community with regards to the implementation of genetic testing in sport. Despite an insufficient evidence base, however, various stakeholders (e.g., athletes, support staff) have used, and will likely continue using, genetic tests. We offered potential explanations regarding the allure of genetic information to sports stakeholders before suggesting some imperfect solutions in terms of increasing genetic literacy, promoting talent inclusion, and following a minimum set of best practice guidelines.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 24 Jun 2024

    Keywords

    • athlete development
    • genomics
    • high performance
    • polymorphism
    • talent identification

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Talent inclusion: An imperfect solution to genetic testing in sport - Response to commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this