TY - JOUR
T1 - Talking a Good Game
T2 - Identifying the Discrepancies of Football Coaches’ Beliefs and Actions in Player Selection
AU - Kite, Richard James
AU - Ashford, Michael
AU - Noon, Mark
AU - Morris, Rhys
AU - Clarke, Neil
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Coach intuition plays a critical role in the selection of academy players. A coach’s beliefs about a player's current abilities and perceived potential are critical in deciding a player’s future. Therefore, this study attempted to gain insight towards each coach’s experience and beliefs in selecting players, before undertaking a hypothetical selection activity to understand whether coaches act on such knowledge. Twenty-four coaches recruited from 21 unique professional football (soccer) academies (nine Category 1, eight Category 2, and seven Category 3) took part in semi-structured interviews. The findings established that coach beliefs and actions differed, whereby coaches stated a wide range of holistic beliefs towards selection, yet the hypothetical scenario outlined a far narrower selection criteria applied in action. While several beliefs were reinforced, it was also clear that biases were also presented. Maturation-related bias, favoring the more mature players, explained a potential focus on specific physical qualities (speed) and the perceived potential of players. Additionally, a focus on current performance, over wider elements related to perceived future potential, was evident during the selection scenario. Moreover, while subjective input will remain a key contributor to the player selection process, objective assessments and the input of wider multidisciplinary staff should be utilized to help mitigate the above-mentioned issues.
AB - Coach intuition plays a critical role in the selection of academy players. A coach’s beliefs about a player's current abilities and perceived potential are critical in deciding a player’s future. Therefore, this study attempted to gain insight towards each coach’s experience and beliefs in selecting players, before undertaking a hypothetical selection activity to understand whether coaches act on such knowledge. Twenty-four coaches recruited from 21 unique professional football (soccer) academies (nine Category 1, eight Category 2, and seven Category 3) took part in semi-structured interviews. The findings established that coach beliefs and actions differed, whereby coaches stated a wide range of holistic beliefs towards selection, yet the hypothetical scenario outlined a far narrower selection criteria applied in action. While several beliefs were reinforced, it was also clear that biases were also presented. Maturation-related bias, favoring the more mature players, explained a potential focus on specific physical qualities (speed) and the perceived potential of players. Additionally, a focus on current performance, over wider elements related to perceived future potential, was evident during the selection scenario. Moreover, while subjective input will remain a key contributor to the player selection process, objective assessments and the input of wider multidisciplinary staff should be utilized to help mitigate the above-mentioned issues.
UR - https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/15504/
M3 - Article
SN - 2573-2773
VL - 7
SP - 352
EP - 368
JO - Journal of Expertise
JF - Journal of Expertise
IS - 1
ER -