Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: The ASCKS framework

  • Judith Johnson*
  • , Jane Arezina
  • , Liz Tomlin
  • , Siobhan Alt
  • , Jon Arnold
  • , Sarah Bailey
  • , Hannah Beety
  • , Ruth Bender-Atik
  • , Louise Bryant
  • , Jen Coates
  • , Sam Collinge
  • , Jo Fishburn
  • , Jane Fisher
  • , Jan Fowler
  • , Tracey Glanville
  • , Julian Hallett
  • , Ailith Harley-Roberts
  • , Gill Harrison
  • , Karen Horwood
  • , Catriona Hynes
  • Lindsay Kimm, Alison McGuinness, Lucy Potter, Liane Powell, Janelle Ramsay, Pieta Shakes, Roxanne Sicklen, Alexander Sims, Tomasina Stacey, Anushka Sumra, Samantha Thomas, Karen Todd, Jacquie Torrington, Rebecca Trueman, Lorraine Walsh, Katherine Watkins, Gill Yaz, Natasha K. Hardicre
*Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Leeds
    • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • University of New South Wales
    • Public Health England
    • Tiny Tickers Limited
    • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Nest Independent Midwifery
    • The Miscarriage Association
    • SANDS (Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society)
    • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    • Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust
    • ARC (Antenatal Results and Choices)
    • SOFT UK (Support Organisation for Trisomy 13/18)
    • Leeds General Infirmary
    • The Down’s Syndrome Association
    • Sunshine Smiles – Leeds Down Syndrome Network
    • Society and College of Radiographers
    • Independent Lay Expert
    • Sheffield Hallam University
    • The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    • MVP (Maternity Voices Partnership)
    • Women’s Health Matters
    • Independent Lay Expert
    • Southern Cross University
    • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    • University of Huddersfield
    • University of Sydney
    • Department of Health and Social Care
    • City, University of London
    • Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
    • Equality)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (SciVal)
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)235-245
    Number of pages11
    JournalUltrasound
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 1 Nov 2020

    Funding

    Not applicable. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The research was supported by the Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (NIHR YH PSTRC) and the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber (www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk ; Reference: NIHR IS-CLA-0113-10020). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or the College of Radiographers.

    Keywords

    • Ultrasound
    • communication
    • guidelines
    • news delivery
    • sonography
    • training

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: The ASCKS framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this