UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: The ASCKS framework

Judith Johnson*, Jane Arezina, Liz Tomlin, Siobhan Alt, Jon Arnold, Sarah Bailey, Hannah Beety, Ruth Bender-Atik, Louise Bryant, Jen Coates, Sam Collinge, Jo Fishburn, Jane Fisher, Jan Fowler, Tracey Glanville, Julian Hallett, Ailith Harley-Roberts, Gill Harrison, Karen Horwood, Catriona HynesLindsay Kimm, Alison McGuinness, Lucy Potter, Liane Powell, Janelle Ramsay, Pieta Shakes, Roxanne Sicklen, Alexander Sims, Tomasina Stacey, Anushka Sumra, Samantha Thomas, Karen Todd, Jacquie Torrington, Rebecca Trueman, Lorraine Walsh, Katherine Watkins, Gill Yaz, Natasha K. Hardicre

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (SciVal)
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)235-245
    Number of pages11
    JournalUltrasound
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 1 Nov 2020

    Funding

    Not applicable. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The research was supported by the Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (NIHR YH PSTRC) and the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber (www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk ; Reference: NIHR IS-CLA-0113-10020). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or the College of Radiographers.

    Keywords

    • Ultrasound
    • communication
    • guidelines
    • news delivery
    • sonography
    • training

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: The ASCKS framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this