Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: intersectionality patterns and associated lessons

Panayiota Tsatsou*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    39 Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    This paper presents a study of focus groups on three vulnerable population categories (ethnic minorities, older people and people with disabilities) and explores the patterns of intersectionality in these populations’ digital inclusion and its role in their social inclusion. The paper illustrates the value of the concept of intersectionality within the study of the aforementioned three vulnerable populations’ digital inclusion and questions the existing evidence available on the roles of nationality, ageing and disability in their digital inclusion. It identifies patterns of intersectionality that stress the role of individuality and life circumstances (such as life changes and periods of transition), as well as the stigma and concomitant experiences of social marginalisation regarding the digital inclusion of these populations. The paper concludes by pointing out the policy significance of intersectional patterns in the digital domain and calls for a systematic study of the different categories of the cultural and social specificities of vulnerability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1475-1494
    Number of pages20
    JournalInformation Communication and Society
    Volume25
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 6 Mar 2021

    Funding

    This work was supported by College of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, University of Leicester [Grant Number S15RE106].

    FundersFunder number
    Arts and Humanities, University of LeicesterS15RE106
    College of Social Sciences

      Keywords

      • Age
      • digital inclusion
      • disability
      • intersectionality
      • nationality
      • vulnerability

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: intersectionality patterns and associated lessons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this