What does ‘routine post-op neuro obs’ really mean? Establishing a guideline

Claire Lynch (Corresponding / Lead Author), Chloe Gwynn, Katie Holland, Amelia Swift

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background:
    Neurosurgery carries a risk of post-operative deterioration that can be detected using neurological observations (NO). NO are frequently requested by surgeons using the phrase ‘routine post-op neuro obs’. There is no agreed definition of what this means.

    Aims:
    To identify the range of possible interpretations of the phrase ‘routine post-op neuro obs’ by nurses and surgeons.

    Method:
    National policy analysis, literature review, notes audit and survey methods were used to identify national and local practice. Data were analysed descriptively using Excel.

    Findings:
    Two out of 15 policies contained observation guidance. Fifteen surgeons used five terms to describe post-operative observations. ‘Routine’ was used to describe observation frequency anywhere between every 15 minutes and every 4 hours. Nurses varied in their interpretation, and frequency was based on clinical judgement.

    Conclusion:
    Post-operative instructions and nursing practice vary. There is a need and desire for clear evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistency and patient safety.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)258-263
    JournalBritish Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
    Volume14
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (VoR) - 18 Dec 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What does ‘routine post-op neuro obs’ really mean? Establishing a guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this